Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Ayaskanta Judge (Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 07-Aug-2026 19:40:27
Judgment
…. Petitioner(s) Mr. Manoranjan Padhy, Adv. versus- …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Debashish Nayak, AGA CORAM: HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI Order No. 01. ORDER 07.08.2026
#1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
#2. In filing the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the notice to show cause issued by the Additional Tahasildar, Nabarangpur in Encroachment Case No.4-1507/2026 vide Annexure-2.
#3. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.
#4. Learned counsel for the State, at the outset, submits that instead of filing reply to the show cause notice vide Annexure-2, the Petitioner has preferred the present Writ Petition. Hence, the prayer made in this Writ Petition is premature.
#5. Considering the above submission of learned counsel for Signature Not Verified the State, this Court directs the Petitioner to file her reply Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 07-Aug-2026 19:40:27 to the show cause notice vide Annexure-2 within a period of ten working days hence. In such event, the Additional Tahasildar, Nabarangpur shall look into the reply of the Petitioner and pass a lawful order on the said reply of the Petitioner pertaining to the above noted Encroachment Case within a period of fifteen working days thereafter.
#6. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Ayaskanta Judge (Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 07-Aug-2026 19:40:27
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.