Prasant Kumar Parida & Ors. v. State of Odisha & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K R MOHAPATRA, SAVITRI RATHO
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the above, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the writ petition disposes of the same as withdrawn. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge Himansu (Savitri Ratho) Judge Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH Reason: Authentication Location…
Judgment
Petitioners Mr.Pramod Ranjan Behera , Advocate …. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 18.06.2025 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. The Petitioners, in this writ application, prays for a direction Order No.
to the Land Acquisition Officer, Puri (Opposite Party No.2) to pay compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation Resettlement Act, 2013 read with Land Acquisition Act, 1894. In the alternative, the Petitioners prays for a direction to the said Authority to dispose of the representation dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure-3) by providing an opportunity of hearing.
In course of hearing, Mr. Behera, learned counsel for the Petitioners by filing a Memo in Court prays for withdrawal of the writ petition to seek remedy, if any, under the statute. The Memo is taken on record.
In view of the above, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the writ petition disposes of the same as withdrawn. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge Himansu (Savitri Ratho) Judge Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 19-Jun-2025 13:46:57
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.