✦ Orissa High Court

State of Orissa v. Kalia @ Kalicharan Naik & Anr.

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed. As a result, the CRLLP is dismissed on the ground of limitation. Chief Justice (Dr. S. Muralidhar) M. Panda Judge (G. Satapathy) Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MRUTYUNJAYA PANDA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason…

Judgment

Mr. J. Katikia, AGA CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY ORDER 03.07.2023 Order No. Misc. Case No.43 of 2015 and CRLLP No.60 of 2015

#1. The delay of 147 days in filing the appeal has not been properly explained. It does not satisfy the requirement as explained by the Supreme Court of India in Chief Post Master General v. Living Media India Ltd. (2012) 3 SCC 563 and The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bherulal (2020) 10 SCC 654.

#2. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed. As a result, the CRLLP is dismissed on the ground of limitation. Chief Justice (Dr. S. Muralidhar) M. Panda Judge (G. Satapathy) Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MRUTYUNJAYA PANDA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 04-Jul-2023 15:07:06

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLLP No. 60 of 2015). ← Search more judgments