✦ Orissa High Court

Judgment · High Court

D DASH2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
D DASH

Provisions considered

Judgment

Petitioner Mr. P.R. Chhatoi, Advocate State of Odisha -versus- …. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Nayak, AGA. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE D.DASH Order No. ORDER 30.03.2022

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement (virtual/ physical) mode.

2.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that this Petitioner being the mother-in-law of the deceased, as the deceased was died by hanging herself within a period of seven year of marriage, she has been unnecessarily arraigned in the case as an accused with the general allegations that she was joining her son and others in demanding dowry and torturing the deceased. It is his submission that as opined by the doctor, the death is due to asphyxia resulting from ante-mortem hanging and no other feature on the body suggestive of physical torture before the incident has also been noticed. He further submits that the husband of the deceased having been arrested has already been released on bail. In view of all these above and in the absence of any other impediment; he urges for grant of anticipatory bail to the Petitioner.

3.

Learned counsel for the State does not dispute the fact that the deceased as per the opinion of the doctor has committed suicide by hanging herself and that no such bodily injury suggestive of any // 2 // physical torture sometime before the incident has also been noticed. He, however, submits that the Petitioner being the mother-in-law with the allegations of demand and torture at her instance upon the deceased, her culpability by virtue of attraction of the presumption under section-113A/113B of the Evidence Act stands drawn.

4.

Considering the submissions and on going through the nature of accusations; further keeping in view the surrounding circumstances of the case as also concerning the Petitioner as also the role said to have been played by the Petitioner in the incident and in the absence of any other impediment, it is directed that in the event the Petitioner surrenders before the court in seisin of the case in connection with Mancheswar P.S. Case No.134 of 2020 corresponding to C.T. Case No.1561 of 2020 on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Bhubaneswar within two weeks hence and moves for her release on bail, she shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as would be deemed just and proper by the Court in seisin of the case with further condition that she will not threaten or terrorize the prosecution witnesses in any manner.

5.

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. (D. Dash), Judge. Narayan

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments