✦ Orissa High Court

Bisai @ Biswanath Swain & Ors. v. State of Odisha

D DASH2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. H Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 25-Aug-2023 17:29:47 (D. Dash), Judge.

Judgment

…. Opposite Party Mr.P.K. Mohanty, ASC. Mr. P.R. Singh, Advocate (Informant) CORAM: MR. JUSTICE D.DASH Order No. ORDER 23.08.2028

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement (virtual/physical) mode.

2.

Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that these Petitioners are the in-laws of the deceased, when the deceased committed suicide within a period of seven years of marriage, they have been unnecessarily arraigned in the case as accused with the general allegations that they were joining with their son and other family members in demanding dowry and torturing the deceased. It is his submission that the doctor holding postmortem examination has noticed no other feature on the body suggestive of physical torture before the incident. It is further submitted that in the meantime, husband of the deceased being arrested has been released on bail. In view of all these above and in the absence of any other impediment; he urges for grant of anticipatory bail to the Petitioners.

3.

Learned counsel for the State does not dispute the fact that the deceased as per the opinion of the doctor has committed suicide and that no such bodily injury suggestive of any physical // 2 // torture sometime before the incident has also been noticed. He, however, submits that the Petitioners being the in-laws with the allegations of demand and torture at their instance upon the deceased, their culpability by virtue of attraction of the available presumption under section-113A/113B of the Evidence Act stands drawn.

4.

Considering the submissions and on going through the nature of accusations; further keeping in view the surrounding circumstances of the case as also concerning the Petitioners as also the role said to have been played by these Petitioners in the incident and in the absence of any other impediment, it is directed that in the event the Petitioners surrender before the Court in seisin of the case in connection with Khurda Sadar P.S. Case No.97 of 2020 corresponding to G.R. Case No.633 of 2020 on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Khurda within three weeks hence and move for their release on bail, they shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as would be deemed just and proper by the Court in seisin of the case with further condition that they will not threaten or terrorize the prosecution witnesses in any manner.

5.

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. H Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 25-Aug-2023 17:29:47 (D. Dash), Judge.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments