Signed by: SASANKA SEKHAR SATAPATHY v. Pradipta Kumar Rout
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ss. 47, 115
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, the CMP is disposed of without interfering with the order impugned herein.
Judgment
Petitioners Mr. Satya Narayan Mishra, Advocate .... -versus- Pradipta Kumar Rout …. Opp. Party CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA Order No.
ORDER 10.04.2024 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. Petitioners in this writ petition seek to assail the order dated 14th March, 2024 (Annexure-4) passed in Execution Case No.6 of 2018, whereby learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nayagarh rejected an application under Section 47 CPC.
Since the order impugned herein is revisable one under Section 115 CPC, I am not inclined to entertain the CMP.
Accordingly, the CMP is disposed of without interfering with the order impugned herein.
Certified copy of the impugned order under Annexure-4 shall be returned to learned counsel for the Petitioner on being substituted with attested photocopy thereof. Issue urgent certified copy of this order on proper application. s.s.satapathy (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.