✦ Orissa High Court

Sk. Mujafar Husen v. State of Odisha

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. P.S. Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Mr. A.K. Pati, ASC Order No. 01. 1. ORDER 23.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

#2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No. 147 of 2025 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C. , Ghatgaon, arising out of Ghatgaon P.S. Case No.345 of 2025, commission of offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 281, 303(2), 317(2), 109(1), 111(3), 221 and 190 of BNS, 2023, r/w Section 11(1)(d) of P.C.A. Act, 1990 and Section 25 of the Arms Act,

#3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail.

#4. Taking into account the nature of allegations, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioners shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper.

#5. It is needless to state that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

#6. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Jina

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 2896 of 2026). ← Search more judgments