State of Orissa v. Ashoka Perua & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed. As a result, the CRLLP is dismissed on the ground of limitation. Chief Justice (Dr. S. Muralidhar) M. Panda Judge (G. Satapathy) Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MRUTYUNJAYA PANDA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason…
Judgment
Mr. G. N. Rout, ASC …. Opposite Parties CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY ORDER 03.07.2023 Order No. Misc. Case No.35 of 2015 and CRLLP No.30 of 2015
The delay of 80 days in filing the appeal has not been properly explained. It does not satisfy the requirement as explained by the Supreme Court of India in Chief Post Master General v. Living Media India Ltd. (2012) 3 SCC 563 and The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bherulal (2020) 10 SCC 654.
Consequently, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed. As a result, the CRLLP is dismissed on the ground of limitation. Chief Justice (Dr. S. Muralidhar) M. Panda Judge (G. Satapathy) Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MRUTYUNJAYA PANDA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 04-Jul-2023 15:07:06
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.