Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO v. Hari Sankar Dubey & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. XXXIX rr. 1, 2
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Judgment
Jagannath Mohaprabhu Bije, Srikhetra and another …. Petitioners None …. Opp. Parties None CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA Order No.
ORDER 11.08.2023 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
None appears for the parties at the time of call. Judgment dated 7th August, 2012 (Annexure-1) passed by 3. learned 2nd Additional District Judge, Puri in F.A.O. No.54/142 of 2010-2005 is under challenge in this writ petition, whereby dismissing the appeal, it confirmed the order dated 23rd September, 2005 (Annexure-3) passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Puri dismissing I.A. No.162 of 2005 (arising out of C.S. No.265 of 2005) under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C.
Since none appears for the parties, this Court feels that they have lost interest in pursuing the matter.
Operative part
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XXXIX rr. 1, 2.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.