A. Kumari v. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Since none appears for the Petitioner to pursue the matter, this RPFAM is dismissed for non-prosecution. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Judgment
ORDER 03.04.2023
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
None appears for the Petitioner at the time of call.
Judgment dated 29th March, 2016 (Annexure-1) passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack in C.R.P. No.721 of 2008 is under challenge in this RPFAM, whereby an application filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been dismissed on contest.
It appears from the record that no requisite for issuance of notice to the Opposite Party in his correct address has yet been filed pursuant to the order dated 19th April, 2017.
Since none appears for the Petitioner to pursue the matter, this RPFAM is dismissed for non-prosecution. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.