✦ Madhya Pradesh High Court

ADVOCATES) v. (BY SHRI A.K. JAIN WITH SHRI SUNIL JAIN-ADVOCATES )

Writ Appeal No. 751 of 2012MILIND RAMESH PHADKE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. SHRI KARUN AGARWAL C/O KARUN MOTORS NEAR GUNA CHUNGI NAKA A.B.ROAD SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH) 2 (BY SHRI A.K. JAIN WITH SHRI SUNIL JAIN-ADVOCATES ) .....RESPONDENTS This appeal coming on for admission this day, JUSTICE ROHIT ARYA passed the following: ORDER This intra-Court appeal under…

Judgment

SMT. MALTI SHARMA W/O LATE RAJENDRA YEARS, SHARMA, AGED OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/O 46-ADARSH NAGAR, NEAR PUNDHIR TRAVELS, SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH) ABOUT 49 (BY SHRI NAROTTAM SHARMA WITH SHRI S.S. KUSHWAHA- ADVOCATES) .....APPELLANT

5.

AND THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG, BANDRA (EAST), MUMBAI (MADHYA PRADESH) THE DIRECTOR [MARKETING] INDIAN OIL CORPORATION ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG BANDRA [EAST] MUMBAI (MADHYA PRADESH) THE SENIOR AREA MANAGER INDIAN OIL CORPORATION FIFTH FLOOR PARYAVAS BHAWAN MOTHER TERESA ROAD ARERA HILLS (MADHYA PRADESH) JAIL ROAD BHOPAL SHRI MOHAN KUMAR GOLE OCCUPATION: THROUGH SENIOR AREA MANAGER INDIAN OIL CORPORATION FIFTH FLOOR PARYAVAS BHAWAN MOTHER TERESA ROAD ARERA HILLS (MADHYA PRADESH) JAIL ROAD BHOPAL SHRI TARUN AGARWAL C/O KARUN MOTORS NEAR GUNA CHUNGI NAKA A.B.ROAD SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)

Operative part

6.

SHRI KARUN AGARWAL C/O KARUN MOTORS NEAR GUNA CHUNGI NAKA A.B.ROAD SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH) 2 (BY SHRI A.K. JAIN WITH SHRI SUNIL JAIN-ADVOCATES ) .....RESPONDENTS This appeal coming on for admission this day, JUSTICE ROHIT ARYA passed the following: ORDER This intra-Court appeal under Section 2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal Adhiniyam, 2005 is directed against the order dated 11/10/2012 passed in W.P. No.1077/2009 by the learned Single Judge. The subject matter of the writ petition relates to allotment of LPG Dealership. The appellant participated in the process of selection alongwith other competitors. Upon relative assessment of the credentials, Indian Oil Corporation decided to allot LPG dealership in favour of respondent No.5. At this stage, appellant preferred a writ petition No.1077/2009 alleging that the process for allotment was not followed at the time of allotment of LPG dealership in favour of respondent No.5. This Court having perused the impugned order is of the considered view that the contentions raised by the appellant has been aptly dealt with by the learned Single Judge. Hence, no interference is warranted in the intra-Court appeal. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. (ROHIT ARYA) JUDGE VARSHA CHATURVEDI 12:11:48 +05'30' (MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madhya Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Appeal No. 751 of 2012). ← Search more judgments