✦ Madhya Pradesh High Court

(BY SHRI ASHISH SARASWAT- ADVOCATE) v. (SHRI UPENDRA YADAV- ADVOCATE

MISC. Petition No. 2626 of 2021AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as having rendered

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. RADHE SHYAM SINGH GURJAR, S/O LATE MADHO SINGH GURJAR, AGED 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION: GURJAR THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE CHURHELA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT- MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH) ANIL KUMAR MANGAL S/O SHRI HARISH CHANDRA MANGAL, AGED 45 YEARS R/O T.R. PURAM COLONY, MORENA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT- MORENA…

Judgment

HARISH CHANDRA MANGAL S/O SHRI SHANKAR LAL MANGAL OCCUPATION: BUSINESS, R/O T.R. PURAM COLONY, MORENA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH) SMT POONAM MANGAL W/O SHRI SUNIL M ANGAL, R/O T.R. PURAM COLONY, MORENA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH) MANISH MANGAL S/O SHRI HARISH CHANDRA M ANGAL, R/O T.R. PURAM COLONY, MORENA, (MADHYA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-MORENA PRADESH) MANISH MANGAL S/O SHRI HARISH CHANDRA MANGAL, R/O T.R. PURAM COLONY, MORENA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH) (BY SHRI ASHISH SARASWAT- ADVOCATE) .....PETITIONERS AND

Operative part

2.

RADHE SHYAM SINGH GURJAR, S/O LATE MADHO SINGH GURJAR, AGED 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION: GURJAR THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE CHURHELA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT- MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH) ANIL KUMAR MANGAL S/O SHRI HARISH CHANDRA MANGAL, AGED 45 YEARS R/O T.R. PURAM COLONY, MORENA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT- MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH), (SHRI UPENDRA YADAV- ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1) .....RESPONDENTS Signature Not Verified Signed by: RAHUL SINGH PARIHAR Signing time: 02-11-2023 10:24:22 AM This petition coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the 2 following: ORDER At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that his application under Order I Rule 10 (2) read with Section 151 of CPC was dismissed vide order dated 30/06/2021 by the First Civil Judge, Class-II, Morena (M.P.) in Civil Suit No.35A/2021. After filing this petition, he has filed a separate Civil Suit No.39A/2022 on 04/11/2022, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned Court. (AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Signed by: RAHUL SINGH PARIHAR Signing time: 02-11-2023 10:24:22 AM

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as having rendered

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madhya Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. MISC. Petition No. 2626 of 2021). ← Search more judgments