(BY SHRI ASHISH SARASWAT- ADVOCATE) v. (SHRI UPENDRA YADAV- ADVOCATE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as having rendered
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. RADHE SHYAM SINGH GURJAR, S/O LATE MADHO SINGH GURJAR, AGED 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION: GURJAR THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE CHURHELA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT- MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH) ANIL KUMAR MANGAL S/O SHRI HARISH CHANDRA MANGAL, AGED 45 YEARS R/O T.R. PURAM COLONY, MORENA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT- MORENA…
Judgment
HARISH CHANDRA MANGAL S/O SHRI SHANKAR LAL MANGAL OCCUPATION: BUSINESS, R/O T.R. PURAM COLONY, MORENA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH) SMT POONAM MANGAL W/O SHRI SUNIL M ANGAL, R/O T.R. PURAM COLONY, MORENA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH) MANISH MANGAL S/O SHRI HARISH CHANDRA M ANGAL, R/O T.R. PURAM COLONY, MORENA, (MADHYA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-MORENA PRADESH) MANISH MANGAL S/O SHRI HARISH CHANDRA MANGAL, R/O T.R. PURAM COLONY, MORENA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH) (BY SHRI ASHISH SARASWAT- ADVOCATE) .....PETITIONERS AND
Operative part
RADHE SHYAM SINGH GURJAR, S/O LATE MADHO SINGH GURJAR, AGED 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION: GURJAR THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE CHURHELA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT- MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH) ANIL KUMAR MANGAL S/O SHRI HARISH CHANDRA MANGAL, AGED 45 YEARS R/O T.R. PURAM COLONY, MORENA, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT- MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH), (SHRI UPENDRA YADAV- ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1) .....RESPONDENTS Signature Not Verified Signed by: RAHUL SINGH PARIHAR Signing time: 02-11-2023 10:24:22 AM This petition coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the 2 following: ORDER At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that his application under Order I Rule 10 (2) read with Section 151 of CPC was dismissed vide order dated 30/06/2021 by the First Civil Judge, Class-II, Morena (M.P.) in Civil Suit No.35A/2021. After filing this petition, he has filed a separate Civil Suit No.39A/2022 on 04/11/2022, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned Court. (AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Signed by: RAHUL SINGH PARIHAR Signing time: 02-11-2023 10:24:22 AM
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as having rendered
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.