Civil Revision No. 174 of 2021 · Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The revision stands dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 115; O. 7 r. 11
Judgment
SITARAM TYAGI MAHARAJ SANRAKSHAK SHRI DEV RAMJANKI PANCHMUKHI HANUMAN BADA MANDIR, DISTRICT BARMANKALA, NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) KARELI, TEHSIL .....APPLICANT (BY SHRI J.S.GULATI - ADVOCATE) AND
NEERAJ SAHU S/O SHRI VIJAY SHANKAR SAHU R/O BARMANKALA, TEHSIL KARELI, DISTRICT NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) TEHSILDAR DISTT.NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) NARSINGHPUR TEHSIL KARELI SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER NARSINGHPUR DISTT.NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH CO LLECTO R DISTT.NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) (RESPONDENT NO.1 BY NONE) (RESPONDENTS NO.2-4 BY SHRI S.S.SENGAR - PANEL LAWYER) .....RESPONDENTS T h is revision coming on admission this day, t h e cou rt passed the following: ORDER Challenge in this revision under section 115 of CPC is to the order dated
19.1.2021 passed by IXth Additional Civil Judge Class-II to the court of First Signature Not Verified Signed by: RAJESH MAMTANI Signing time: 19-01-2024 20:53:22 Civil Judge Class-II, District Narsinghpur in Civil Suit No.88-A/2019 whereby the application of applicant/defendant under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC has been 2 dismissed. A s per computer CMIS report it is reflected that suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff before the trial Court has already been dismissed on
Operative part
30.9.2023. Since the civil suit from which this civil revision arise itself has been dismissed, the instant revision has rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of. The revision stands dismissed as infructuous. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned trial Court. RM (AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Signed by: RAJESH MAMTANI Signing time: 19-01-2024 20:53:22
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The revision stands dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 115; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 7 r. 11.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.