✦ Madhya Pradesh High Court

(BY SHRI CHANDRIKA DWIVEDI, ADVOCATE) v. (BY SHRI CP TIWARI, GOVT. ADVOCATE)

Writ Petition No. 17931 of 2022NANDITA DUBEY

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Considering the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of with a direction to

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. (BY SHRI CP TIWARI, GOVT. ADVOCATE) .....RESPONDENTS This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER The innocuous prayer of the petitioner in the present petition is that his representation dated 3.1.2022 (Annexure P/4) pending before respondentNo.3/Collector, Rewa…

Judgment

Between:- SHRI KAMALJEET SAVIKNANDAN VERMA, AGED ABOUT 28 Y E A R S , OCCUPATION: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, R/O VILLAGE GHUREHATA POST MAUGANJ DISTRICT REWA (M.P.) LATE S/O (BY SHRI CHANDRIKA DWIVEDI, ADVOCATE) .....PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (M.P.) JOINT S E C R E TA R I AT ARERA (MADHYA PRADESH) DIRECTOR, PANCHAYAT HILLS, RAJ BHOPAL COLLECTOR, REWA DISTRICT REWA M.P. EXECUTIVE CHIEF OFFICER, JANPAD PANCHAYAT JANPAD PANCHAYAT TEONTHAR, DISTRICT REWA M.P.

Operative part

4.

(BY SHRI CP TIWARI, GOVT. ADVOCATE) .....RESPONDENTS This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER The innocuous prayer of the petitioner in the present petition is that his representation dated 3.1.2022 (Annexure P/4) pending before respondentNo.3/Collector, Rewa be decided at an early date. Learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection to the 2 aforesaid prayer. Considering the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3/Collector, Rewa to decide the pending representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner as per law within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. It is made clear that this Court has not opined on the merits of the case. With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. MANZOOR AHMED 2022.08.18 10:31:11 +05'30' Ansari (NANDITA DUBEY) JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madhya Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 17931 of 2022). ← Search more judgments