✦ Manipur High Court

N. Khelemba Meitei v. RK. Lalsana Singh & 3 Ors

MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WP(C) No. 92 of 2026A GUNESHWAR SHARMA

Judgment

BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA ….Respondent/s

24.04.2026 Order [1] Mr. Y. Nikhil, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that writ petition may be closed as infructuous as the petitioner has got relief as prayed for in the writ petition. [2] Mr. S. Niranjan, learned G.A. for the State respondent and Ms. M. Nikita, learned counsel for the private respondent, submit that this Court may pass appropriate order in terms of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. [3] Recording the submissions made at the bar, writ petition is closed as infructuous, Misc. applications are also disposed of. Interim order, if any, is merged with the final order. Kh. Joshua Maring JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Manipur High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WP(C) No. 92 of 2026). ← Search more judgments