THE ELAMPAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO. 604 v. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G)
Case at a glance
- Bench
- BASANT BALAJI
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Heard the counsel for the petitioner as well as the Government Pleader. WPC 15206/2024 -3- Taking into consideration the limited request of the counsel for the petitioner, I direct the 1st respondent to take up Ext.P1 and pass appropriate orders within a period of…
Judgment
GP SRI. TONY AUGUSTIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 15206/2024 -2- JUDGMENT (Dated this the 11th day of April 2024) The petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society. The Society has a Head Office at Elampal and four branches. The Board of Directors of the Society by a resolution number 1407 dated 20.10.2021, had resolved the request of the 1st respondent for sanction of additional 1 each posts of Junior Clerk for the four branches and one post of Branch Manager, and a Peon for the Head Office main branch. Ext.P1 is the application submitted by the petitioner to the 1st respondent on 09.11.2021.
The limited request of the counsel for the petitioner is a disposal of Ext.P1 within a time frame.
Operative part
Heard the counsel for the petitioner as well as the Government Pleader. WPC 15206/2024 -3- Taking into consideration the limited request of the counsel for the petitioner, I direct the 1st respondent to take up Ext.P1 and pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- BASANT BALAJI JUDGE JS WPC 15206/2024 -4- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15206/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 9-11-2021
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.