BY AD v. P.MOHANDAS
Case at a glance
- Bench
- BASANT BALAJI
Outcome
Disposed of
since no orders are passed, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Taking into consideration that, Ext.P6 is a representation filed by set of persons on 26.12.2023 and since no orders are passed, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to place Ext.P6 before the Board. The Board shall take a decision on…
Judgment
well as the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
Operative part
Taking into consideration that, Ext.P6 is a representation filed by set of persons on 26.12.2023 and since no orders are passed, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to place Ext.P6 before the Board. The Board shall take a decision on Ext.P6, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- BASANT BALAJI JUDGE WP(C) NO. 2712 OF 2024 5 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 2712/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit -P1 Exhibit -P2 Exhibit -P3 Exhibit -P4 Exhibit -P5 Exhibit -P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE SPECIAL RULES PUBLISHED BY THE WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT AS PER G.O. (P)NO. 46/2011/WRD DATED 19-07-2011 TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO. 9047/E10/2016/KW DATED 23-04-2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF ELIGIBLE CANDIDATES FORWARDED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS PER LETTER NO. 9047/E10/2016/KWA DATED 30-06-2020 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. 9047/E10/2016/KWA DATED 5-8-2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. A3- 1/50005/2018-KPSC DATED 2-12-2020 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 26-12-2023 RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.