SANKARANARAYANAN THOTTATHIL v. STATE TAX OFFICER
Case at a glance
- Bench
- DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Outcome
Withdrawn
petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
SMT.JASMIN M.M., GP SRI.P.R.SREEJITH SRI.S.RAJMOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO.13311 OF 2024 -: 2 :- JUDGMENT Dated this the 2 nd day of April , 2024 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would like to withdraw this writ petition and to approach the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and State Goods and Services Tax Act against the impugned order in this writ petition. Considering such stand of learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and State Goods and Services Tax Act. If the appeal is filed, the same shall be considered, on its merits, expeditiously, in accordance with law. Sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE Jvt/2.4.2024
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Central Goods and Services Tax Act — s. 107; State Goods and Services Tax Act.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.