Hisbul @ Hizbul v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 395, 397
Judgment
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 19-08-2013 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner languishing in custody since
Operative part
13.11.2012 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. A dacoity was committed in the house of the informant when Rs.10,000/- cash, silver and gold ornaments were robbed by the miscreants. On chase, the petitioner was apprehended from whom a Nokia Mobile and three bamboo sticks were recovered. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was apprehended on suspicion when no robbed articles were recovered. A statement has been made in paragraph 8 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24594 of 2013 (2) dt.19-08-2013 Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Bahadur Ganj P.S. Case No. 194 of 2012. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Sunil/-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 395, 397.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.