✦ Kerala High Court

BY AD v. SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY, SC, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION

O.P No. 381 of 2023MOHAMMED NIAS C P3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

The writ petition is allowed as above

Judgment

Operative part

In view of the above, there will be a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to make necessary corrections in the birth certificates based on the DNA test result stated above and to issue a fresh certificate within ten days from today. The writ petition is allowed as above. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JUDGE LU WP(C) NO. 8275 OF 2024 5 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8275/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT P1 EXHIBIT P2 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 03.07.2012 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P. NO 381/2023 DATED 22.06.2023 OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATUPUZHA TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD OF THE PETITIONER RESPONDENT ANNEXURES : ANNEXURE R2(A) A TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT CIRCULAR NO.142/RD3/15/LSGD DATED 16.12.2015 // True Copy // PA To Judge

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. O.P No. 381 of 2023). ← Search more judgments