THE CORPORATE MANAGER, MARTHOMA & EA SCHOOLS v. STATE OF KERALA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- MOHAMMED NIAS C P
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of as above
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the first respondent to take up Ext.P5 and pass orders in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioner and other affected parties, if any and after affording an opportunity of hearing to them, within an outer…
Judgment
SMT.NISHA BOSE, SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C)No.7205 of 2024 -2- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP(C) No.7205 of 2024 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2024 JUDGMENT The petitioner has preferred Ext.P5 revision before the first respondent, seeking retrospective lien adjustment of teachers as per Ext.P1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no orders have been passed the same so far and seeks a direction to the first respondent to dispose of the same.
Operative part
Accordingly, there will be a direction to the first respondent to take up Ext.P5 and pass orders in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioner and other affected parties, if any and after affording an opportunity of hearing to them, within an outer time limit of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It will be open to the petitioner to produce such documents to substantiate the contentions, which will be adverted to by the first respondent while considering the request The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. JUDGE dlk/23.2.2024 WP(C)No.7205 of 2024 -3- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7205/2024 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER BEARING NO.1125/2022- 23 DATED 25.11.2022 PASSED BY THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER DATED 19.08.2003 THUS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.1 EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 03.02.2020 THUS PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 EXHIBIT P4 EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 BEARING NO.ET1/3742/2023/DGE DATED 11.11.2023 A TRUE COPY OF THE SAID STATUTORY REVISION PETITION DATED 28.11.2023 THUS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.1
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.