WP(C) No. 33977 of 2008 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Writ petition is disposed of as above
Provisions considered
- Kerala Panchayath Raj Act, 1994 s. 220(b)
Judgment
Operative part
ANTONY DOMINIC,J----------------------------------W.P.(C)No.33977 of 2008-------------------------------------Dated this the 27th day of June, 2012 JUDGMENTPetitioner approached this Court mainly challenging inactionon the part of the Panchayath in implementing its decision asreflected in Ext.P5. Ext.P5 is a communication issued by the firstrespondent requiring the second respondent to demolish andremove certain constructions, which were made in violation of Section 220(b) of the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act, 1994. Despite service of notice, the second respondent has notchosen to enter appearance or file a counter affidavit. Once Ext.P5 has been issued, unless the same is stayed orset aside by any superior authority, Panchayath is bound toimplement the same. Therefore, it is directed that if Ext.P5 stillremains in force the Panchayath will ensure that the same isimplemented. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible onthe production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGEln
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition is disposed of as above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Kerala Panchayath Raj Act, 1994 — s. 220(b).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.