M.VISWANATHAN v. BEFORE THE 1 ST
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K SURENDRA MOHAN
Provisions considered
Judgment
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J= = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.22702 of 2012= = = = = = = = = = = = =Dated this the 1st October, 2012.J U D G M E N TThe complaint of the petitioner is regarding the construction of a septic tank by the second respondent within a distance of six meters of the well of the petitioner. According to the petitioner, a distance of at least 7.5 meters has to be maintained with a septic tank as per Section 104of the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act, 1994. Reliance is also placed on Sec.30 of the Travancore Cochin Public HealthAct. Though the petitioner has submitted Exts.P1 and P2representations to the first respondent, it is contended that no action has been taken thereon till date. The petitioner therefore seeks the issue of appropriate directions for the consideration of his complaint. 2.I have heard Adv. Vakkom N.Vijayan who appears for the Panchayat also. WP(C).No.22702/2012.23.Since Exts.P1 and P2 are pending before the first respondent, it is only appropriate that they are considered and necessary orders passed in accordance with law. 4. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the complaint of the petitioner, evidenced herein by Exts.P1 and P2 in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months of the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge)Kvs/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.