L.SUDHARMAKUMARI, ULLIYANGATTU HOUSE v. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS

BY ADV. SRI.A.JAYASANKAR SRI.MANU GOVIND SMT.B.MEERA RESPONDENT(S): ---------------

#1. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

#2. HEDDMASTER, GHS FOR BLIND, KUNNAMKULAM PO, THRISSUR.

#3. C.MANJUSHA, KUNNEKKATTU HOUSE KOTTAPPADY PO., KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR (TYPEWRITINTG INSTRUCTOR GHS FOR BLIND, KUNNAMKULAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.T.MOHAMOOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.33124/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT Challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P7. By Ext.P6 judgment, this court disposed of Writ Petition No.20735/08 filed by the petitioner directing that Ext.P5 representation filed by him should be disposed of by the first respondent, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and respondents 2 and 3.

#2. Petitioner has stated in paragraph `3' of the writ petition that, despite Ext.P6 judgment, he was heard by the Deputy Director of Education(Employment) and the first respondent passed Ext.P7 order. In view of this positive assertion of the petitioner, I am inclined to interfere with Ext.P7 and on that ground I direct that the matter shall be reconsidered by the DPI himself as directed in Ext.P6. 2 Accordingly, Ext.P7 stand quashed and the first respondent shall by himself hear the petitioner and respondents 2 and 3 and pass fresh orders in the matter. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the Ist respondent for compliance. vi. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE 3