✦ Kerala High Court · 16 Mar 2007

WP(C) No. 35203 of 2003 · Kerala High Court

WP(C) No. 35203 of 2003KURIAN JOSEPH2 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
16 Mar 2007
Bench
KURIAN JOSEPH

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition is disposed of as above

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR VOCATIONAL TRAINING, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, SHRAM SHAKTHI BHAVAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI - 110 001. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.RAVIKUMAR, ADDL.CGSC, GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/03/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED…

Judgment

BY ADV. SRI.H.B.SHENOY, SRI.B.ASHOK SHENOY, SMT.LAKSHMI B.SHENOY, SRI.ABU MATHEW, SRI.ANIL KURIAN THOMAS, SRI.SOBHAN GEORGE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------

1.

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LABOUR & REHABILITATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2.

STATE COUNCIL FOR VOCATIONAL TRAINING, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3.

THE DIRECTOR OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 010. W.P.(C). NO.35203/2003:

4.

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR, SHRAM SHAKTHI BHAVAN, RAFI MARG NEW DELHI -110 001.

5.

THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING, GUINDY, CHENNAI- 600 032.

6.

THE TRAINING OFFICE, RELATED INSTRUCTION CENTRE, KADAPAKKADA, KOLLAM.

Operative part

7.

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR VOCATIONAL TRAINING, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, SHRAM SHAKTHI BHAVAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI - 110 001. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.RAVIKUMAR, ADDL.CGSC, GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/03/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.35203/2003: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DTD. NIL ISSUED BY 1ST AND 3RD RESPONDENTS INVITING APPLICATIONS FOR ADMISSION TO TRAINING COURSES IN BASIC TRAINING CENTRE, KOLLAM IN 2000. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO. 00315 ISSUED TO P.1. BY R.2. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO. 00328 ISSUED TO P.2. BY R.2. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CARD DTD. 05/04/2003 ISSUED BY R.6 TO P.1. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CARD DTD. 03/04/2003 ISSUED BY R.6 TO P.2. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 09/05/2003 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONERS AND OTHERS TO R.1. WITH COPY TO R.3. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 08/07/2003 SUBMITTED BY P.2. AND ANOTHER TO R.1. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 04/08/2003 SUBMITTED BY P.2. TO R.3. EXT.P.9: COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM PUBLISHED IN “KERALA KAUMUDI” DAILY DTD. 31/10/2003. EXT.P.10: COPY OF THE LETTER NO. F1/10392/2003 DTD. 20/02/2004 SENT BY THE R.3. TO THE CHIEF MINISTER'S PUBLIC GRIEVANCES REDRESSAL CELL. prv. //TRUE COPY// KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.35203 of 2003 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 16th March, 2007. J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed praying for a direction to the respondents to recognize the Basic Training Course imparted by the Centre at Kollam and run by the respondents 1 and 3, for the purpose of placement for apprenticeship training in accordance with the Apprentices Act, 1961 and for the purpose of appearance in the All India Trade Test. There is already a direction in I.A.8639/04 to take a decision in the matter. In case the petitioners have any surviving grievance, they may pursue the same in appropriate proceedings. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- O.P.No. of 2002 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 16th March, 2007.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of as above

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Apprentices Act, 1961.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Kerala High Court, on 16 Mar 2007. The bench was KURIAN JOSEPH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WP(C) No. 35203 of 2003). ← Search more judgments