O.V. JAMES v. THE DIRECTOR
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 s. 11A
Judgment
WP NO.26354/04 2the Tribunal refused to grant the back wages, clarifying further that the period need not be considered for any service benefits. However, the period of unauthorised absence has been reckoned for the purpose of continuity of service. In the facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that the award is perverse or unreasonable. There is no merit in the writ petition. It isdismissed.KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.tgs
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
IndustrialDisputes Act, 1947 — s. 11A.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 30 Nov 2007. The bench was KURIAN JOSEPH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WP(C) No. 26354 of 2004).
← Search more judgments