GIRLLY NELSON v. STATE OF KERALA
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD.JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2006 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 18923 of 2006(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ GIRLLY NELSON, W/O.V.K.NELSON, VILLEDOM HOUSE, SOURABYA, THRIKKAKKARA NORTH, CHANGAMPUZHA NAGAR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH SRI.FRANKLIN ARACKAL RESPONDENTS: -------------
STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), KANAYANNUR TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, ERNAKULAM-682 011.
VILLAGE OFFICER, THRIKKAKKARA NORTH VILLAGE, THRIKKAKARA.
THE MANAGER, BANK OF INDIA, ERNAKULAM BRANCH, ERNAKULAM. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. S.DILEEP (FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION AT THE LOK ADALATH AND THE PARTIES HAVING SETTLED THE MATTER, THE FOLLOWING AWARD IS PASSED IN TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT: WP(C) NO.18923/2006/C -2- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: APPENDIX EXT. P1: COPY OF DOCUMENT NO:873/95 OF SRO EDAPPALLY DATED 4.2.1995. EXT. P2: EXT. P3: EXT. P4: COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT SHOWING THE REMITTANCE OF LAND TAX FOR THE YEAR 2006-07 BEARING NO.5225077 DATED 15.7.2006. COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE PROPERTY TAX PASS BOOK OF KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY IN THE NAME OF PETITIONER. COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 29.6.2006 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 7 OF REVENUE RECOVERY ACT ON PETITIONER'S SON. EXT. P5: COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 29.6.2006 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON PETITIONER'S SON. /TRUE COPY/ M.M.PAREED PILLAY (RETD. CHIEF JUSTICE) & M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD. JUDGE) W.P.(C) No. 18923 OF 2006 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of December, 2006 A W A R D M.M.PAREED PILLAY (Rtd. Chief Justice) When the matter is taken up in the adalath, counsel appeared for the respondent one and two stated that revenue recovery proceedings will be initiated only against petitioner's son Vinod Nelson and his guarantors, if any. It is made clear that no proceedings pursued against the petitioner or his property by the respondent one and two. The WP(C) is settled as stated above. M.M.PAREED PILLAY (RETD. CHIEF JUSTICE) M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD. JUDGE)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.