SUDARSANAN v. THE KADUTHURUTHY URBAN CO-OP.BANK
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The Writ Petition is dismissed with the above direction
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. AUTHORISED OFFICER, (UNDER SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT 2002) KADUTHURUTHY UBRAN CO-OP. BANK LTD., NO.K.399, KADUTHURUTHY P.O. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING…
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 13TH APRIL 2007 / 23RD CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 12901 of 2007(J) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------
1. SUDARSANAN S/O.MADHAVAN, ARACKAPARAMBIL KALLARA, VAIKOM.
2. JANAKI, W/O.MADHAVAN, ARACKAPARAMBIL, KALLARA, VAIKOM. BY ADV. SRI.LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM RESPONDENTS: -------------
THE KADUTHURUTHY URBAN CO-OP.BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE KADUTHURUTHY URBAN CO.OP. BANK, KADUTHURUTHY.
SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, KADUTHURUTHY URBAN CO-OP.BANK KADUTHURUTHY-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, VAIKOM.
Operative part
AUTHORISED OFFICER, (UNDER SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT 2002) KADUTHURUTHY UBRAN CO-OP. BANK LTD., NO.K.399, KADUTHURUTHY P.O. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 12901 OF 2007-J ----------------------------------------- JUDGMENT The petitioners challenge Ext.P10 notice issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, on behalf of the 1st respondent and also Ext.P11 proceedings issued under Section 13(4) of the said Act. They submit that though they have filed an objection to Ext.P10, the same was not considered and orders passed under Section 13(3A). 2, If the petitioners are aggrieved by any action taken under Section 13(4), pursuant to Section 13(2) notice, they have remedies against the same under Section 17 of the Act. In view of the above position, the Writ Petition is not maintainable. If the 3rd respondent has passed orders under Section 13(3A), the same shall be served on the petitioners, immediately on production of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is dismissed with the above direction. 13th April, 2007. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. Nm/ 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition is dismissed with the above direction
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 13 Apr 2007. The bench was K BALAKRISHNAN NAIR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.