✦ Bombay High Court

Shri Pandurang Tulshiram Palve v. M/s.Shricom Housing Finance Co & Anr.

Writ Petition No. 6138 of 2005D Y CHANDRACHUD

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002

Judgment

Shri Pandurang Tulshiram Palve. Vs. M/s.Shricom Housing Finance Co. & Anr. .... Mr. P. B. Shah with Ms. Smita Mane for the Petitioner. Mr. P. P. Kakade, AGP for Respondent No.3. ..... ...Petitioner. ...Respondents. CORAM : F.I REBELLO AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. September 19, 2005. P.C. The Petitioner has a remedy under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. In the light of that, no interference is called for. The petition is rejected. ( F.I. Rebello, J. ) (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 6138 of 2005). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

More cases under Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002

Continue researching