M/S.MATHA WOOD INDUSTRIES v. THE SALES TAX OFFICER
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Operative part
K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J.-----------------------------------------W.P.(C) NO. 11322 OF 2007-W-----------------------------------------JUDGMENTThe petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P10 interim order passed by the 2ndrespondent on the stay applications filed by it along with S.T.A.Nos.318,319 & 320/2007. It submits, the order is passed mechanically, withoutapplication of mind to the facts of the case.2. Heard the learned Government Pleader for the respondents also. The main contention raised by the petitioner is regarding the huge additionof turnover made. According to it, the addition has no nexus with thesuppression detected. In think, this is a ground which falls within the realmof facts, which has to be considered by the appellate authority. So, I findthat no ground has been made out, warranting interference with Ext.P10under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. But, the learned counsel forthe petitioner prays for some time to pay the amount. The petitioner maypay 25% of the balance tax on or before 16.4.2007 and the balance 25% onor before 30.4.2007. Before the said date the petitioner shall also furnishsecurity for the remaining 50% of the amount, for which the appellate Wpc 11322/20072authority has granted stay. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.2nd April, 2007.K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE.Nm/
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition is disposed of as above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 02 Apr 2007. The bench was K BALAKRISHNAN NAIR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.