M.S. SUNIL v. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to
Judgment
BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: -----------------------
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD.
THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C., PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SHRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC, KSRTC FOR r3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT. N. SUDHADEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.NO.1879/2007 W PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: APPENDIX EXT.P1: COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT APPLICATION DTD.15/12/2006. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE CHALLAN DTD. 15/12/2006. Kss /TRUE COPY/ K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ---------------------------- WP(C).No.1879 of 2007-W ------------------------------- Dated this the Ist day of March, 2007. JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this court feeling aggrieved by the delay from the part of the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 application for regular permit, on the route Guruvayur-Gopalapuram.
Operative part
2. The learned Government Pleader, upon instruction, submitted that Ext.P1 application is received and it is being processed. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and pass final orders on Ext.P1, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. MS K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 01 Mar 2007. The bench was K BALAKRISHNAN NAIR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.