CRL.MC No. 1557 of 2012 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S S SATHEESACHANDRAN
Outcome
Dismissed
Reserving his right to do so, the petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. -----------------------------------------------Crl.M.C No.1557 OF 2012-------------------------------------------------------Dated this the 30th day of May, 2012ORDERPetitioner is the second accused in Crime No.775/2010 of Ollur Police Station, Thrissur. After completion of the investigation of the crime, final report has been laid against the accused, two in number, for offences under Sections 420 and465 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code, before the court. Infurtherance of their common intention to cheat and cause monetary loss to the de facto complainant, the accused have falsely endorsed his Tin No. in the delivery note of S.S.V Traders,a concern operated by the present petitioner and transported366 sacks of coconut from Tamil Nadu through MeenakshipuramCheck Post, is the gist of the accusation imputed against the accused for prosecuting them for the aforesaid offences. Thereis no shred of evidence to connect the accused for any of the offences imputed, is the submission of the counsel for the petitioner to contend that Annexure A1 final report is liable to be quashed. After going through the final report and hearing the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Public Prosecutor, I am not persuaded to accept Crl.M.C No.1557/20122the plea of the petitioner for quashing Annexure A1 final report. Final report has been filed by the police after a full pleadgedinvestigation of the crime. If the charges imputed are groundless petitioner can set forth a plea of discharge before the Magistrate. Reserving his right to do so, the petition is dismissed. Sd/-vdv S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE//True Copy// P.A to Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Reserving his right to do so, the petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.