✦ Kerala High Court

CON.CASE(C) No. 919 of 2012 · Kerala High Court

CON.CASE(C) No. 919 of 2012P N RAVINDRAN3 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
P N RAVINDRAN

Provisions considered

Judgment

BY ADVS.SRI.P.M.MOHAMMED SHIRAZ SMT.G.R.MANJU RESPONDENT/IST RESPONDENT IN W.P(C) : ---------------------------------------------------------------- S.ROOPAKALA JAGATH, AGED 52 YEARS FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, SECRETARY KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN PATTOM.P.O., TRIVANDRUM - 695 004. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...4/- Con. Case(C).No. 919 of 2012 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES : ANNEXURE - A : PHOTOCOPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 02/9/2011 IN WP(C) NO. 23853 OF 2011. ANNEXURE - B : PHOTOCOPY OF LETTER DATED 26/04/2012 OF COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS. ANNEXURE - C : PHOTOCOPY OF LETTER A/D CARD SIGNED BY RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. -------------------------------------- Cont. Case(C) No.919 of 2012 against W.P.(C) No.23853 of 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of July, 2012 JUDGMENT This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondent herein has wilfully disobeyed the direction issued by this Court in Annexure A judgment in W.P.(C) No.23853 of 2011 regarding payment of interest awarded by the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. When the contempt case came up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that except as regards petitioners 6 and 11 rest of the petitioners have received the entire amounts due from the Board. Sri.K.S.Anil, learned standing counsel appearing for the Kerala State Electricity Board submitted that payment of interest will be made to petitioners 6 and 11 within one week from today. The said submission is recorded and the contempt case is closed reserving liberty with the petitioners to move this Court to have this contempt case reopened, if as undertaken, the interest is not paid to the petitioners within one week from today. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. Rkc // true copy// PA to Judge

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CON.CASE(C) No. 919 of 2012). ← Search more judgments