COC No. 17 of 2012 · Kerala High Court
Judgment
BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.THAMBAN SRI.R.REJI SMT.THARA THAMBAN SRI.B.BIPIN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN WPC: ---------------------------------
DR.P.PRABHAKARAN I.A.S. AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRESENTLY WORKING AS CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
P.G.THOMAS , IAS AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER WORKING AS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOLLAM DISTRICT, KOLLAM PIN - 691 001. COC.No17/2012 IN O.P.No.24474/2002
SMT.GIRIJA, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER WORKING AS THE TAHSILDAR, KOLLAM TALUK, KOLLAM KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-01-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: COC.No17/2012 IN O.P.No.24474/2002 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ANNEXURE -I : APPENDIX COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT.05/10/2002 IN W.P.(C)No.24474/2002. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL. True copy P.A. to Judge K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Cont. of Court Case No.17 of 2012. OP.No.24474 of 2002. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 31st January, 2012. J U D G M E N T The Government Pleader has handed over to me the instructions received from the District Collector, Kollam. As per the instructions, the arrears payable to the petitioner as per the order of this Court, consequent to the pay revision of the years 2004 and 2009 have been calculated and an amount of Rs.1,36,518/- has been disbursed to the petitioner on
23.1.2012. A photocopy of the Acquittance Roll bearing the signature of the petitioner, evidencing the receipt of the said amount has also been handed over to me.
2. In view of the above, no further orders are called for in this petition. This Contempt Case is accordingly closed. (Judge) K.SURENDRA MOHAN, Kvs/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.