Judgment · High Court · 2007
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. PANDIKASALA MOYINKUTTY HAJEE, AGED 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT VELIPRAM AMSOM AND DESOM OF KOZHIKODE TALUK. PANDIKASALA ABDURAHIMAN, AGED 45 YEARS VELIPRPAM AMSOM AND DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN SRI.P.A.HARISH THIS APPEAL SUIT HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION AT THE LOK ADALATH AND THE…
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.PAREED PILLAY (RETD.CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD.JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) FRIDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2007 / 15TH PAUSHA 1928 AS.No. 22 of 2000(E) ------------------- OS.186/1996 of III ADDL.SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE .................... APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS: ----------- 1. 2. PANDIKASALA AVARANKUTTY HAJI (DIED) PATHUMMA, W/O.PANDIKASALA AVARANKUTTY HAJEE, AGED 54 YEARS, RESIDING IN VELIPRAM AMSOM AND DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. PANDIKASALA SAKEENA, AGED 37YEARS, RESIDING IN VELIPRAM AMSOM AND DESOM OF KOZHIKODE TALUK. PANDIKASALA SUBAIDA, AGED 32 YEARS, -DO- PANDIKASALA YOOSAF, AGED 30 YEARS, -DO- PANDIKASALA MUHAMMED RAFI, AGED 28 YEARS, -DO- PANDIKASALA JASEENA, AGED 26 YEARS, -DO- PANDIKASALA SARA, AGED 23 YEARS, -DO- PANDIKASALA SAIBUNNISSA, AGED 20 YEARS, -DO- PANDIKASALA MUJEEB RAHMAN, AGED 19 YEARS, -DO-
5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. BY ADV. SRI.R.RAMADAS RESPONDENTS/DEFENDENTS: -------------
PANDIKASALA MOYINKUTTY HAJEE, AGED 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT VELIPRAM AMSOM AND DESOM OF KOZHIKODE TALUK. PANDIKASALA ABDURAHIMAN, AGED 45 YEARS VELIPRPAM AMSOM AND DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN SRI.P.A.HARISH THIS APPEAL SUIT HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION AT THE LOK ADALATH AND THE PARTIES HAVING SETTLED THE MATTER, THE FOLLOWING AWARD IS PASSED IN TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT: M.M.PAREED PILLAY (RETD. CHIEF JUSTICE) & M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD. JUDGE) A.S. No. 22 OF 2000(E) -------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of January, 2007 A W A R D M.M.PAREED PILLAY (Rtd. Chief Justice) Counsel for the appellants and respondents submitted that the matter has already been settled. In view of the above settlement the matter stands closed. Appellants are entitled to the refund of the court fee. M.M.PAREED PILLAY (RETD. CHIEF JUSTICE) M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD. JUDGE)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.