Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- B SREENIVASE GOWDA, EQUITY
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Judgment
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA DATED THIS THE 1OTIT DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012 MFA NO.32496 OF 2011 (MV) APPELLANT BE’iWEEN: RAMAKRISHNA, 5/0. RAJASHEKAR YADAV, AGE: 49 YEARS, RANGE FOREST OFFICER, RANGE FOREST OFFICE. CHANDAPUR, TQ. CHINCHOLI. DIST.: GULBARGA. NOW AT RANGE FOREST OFFICE. YADGIR. (BY SRI HULEPPA HEROOR. ADVOCATE) AND: 1, YELLAPPA, Sb. PENTAYYA © PENTAPPA, AGE: 39 YEARS. 0CC: NOW NIL, R/O. KONCHAVARAM, TQ. CHINCHOLI. DIST.: GULBARGA. NOW RESIDING AT SHIV.AJI NAGAR, H.NO,8-1545/119 (A), GULBARGA.
ThE DISTRICT FOREST OFFICER. OWNER OF JEEP BEARING NO.MEP5562, DISTRICT FOREST OFFICE. STATION ROAD, GULBARGA- 585 102.
THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS. SOCIAL FORESTRY DIVISION, GULBARGA- 585 102. RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 173 (1) OF MV ACT, PLEASED TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE/MODIFY THE NOTICE DATED:30-09-201 1 IN NO.A7/AUSUM/SAVIGU/NYAPRA/ CR/2011-12/571 PURSUANT TO THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 31-03-2010 DELIVERED IN MVC,NO,963 OF 2007 BY THE LEARNED II ADDL., CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.,) AND MACT AT GULBARGA AND DISMISS ThE CLAIM AGAINST THIS APPELLANT AND 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS, AND WITH COSTS THROUGHOUT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS ThIS DAY. THE COURT DELIVERED ThE FOLLOWING:- JUDGMENT Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo stating that appeal may be dismissed withdrawn with a liberty to avail an alternative remedy available in law.
2. Memo is taken on record. 3
Operative part
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. It is always open to the appellant to avail alternative remedy if any available to him in law. NB* Sd/ JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.