KARNATAKA v. SRI.C.CHANNEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R.2)
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of filing of 'B' Report, the writ petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE NBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 46
Judgment
REGD. OFFICE AT NO.52A, ADI SHANKARACHARYA MARG POWAI, MUMBAI - 400 072 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER SRI.YATHISH K S/O KRISHNA T T AGE: 45 YEARS BENGALURU UNIT (BY SRI.SUYOG HERELE E, ADVOCATE) AND:
#1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY KADUR POLICE KADUR CIRCLE CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577101 Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …PETITIONER - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:50050 WP No. 34119 of 2015
#2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA WATER SUPPLY AND UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE BOARD SUB-DIVISION, BELUR ROAD KOTE, CHIKMAGALUR TOWN AND DISTRICT KARNATAKA - 577 101 (BY SMR.RASHMI JADHAV, ADDL. SPP FOR R.1; SRI.C.CHANNEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R.2) …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 22.6.2015 BEARING NO.KDR/PS/CRIME NO.43/2015 AND DATED 27.2.2015 BEARING NO.KDR/PS/CRIME NO.43/2015, AND FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO.43/2015 REGISTERED BY THE R-1 POLICE VIDE ANNX-A, B, C, AND D RESPECTIVELY, AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE & EQUITY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned Additional SPP has filed a memo dated
04.12.2024 along with 'B' Report submitted by the Investigating Officer before the Trial Court and submits - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:50050 WP No. 34119 of 2015 that the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
#2. The said memo is taken on record.
#3. In view of filing of 'B' Report, the writ petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE NBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 46
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.