Motiram v. Sidram
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Ramesh S/o Khandappa Bhoosne Aged 37 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Alanga Tq. Aland, District Gulbarga. ..RESPONDENTS (RESPONDENTS 1 & 4 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 30.11.2009 PASSED ON…
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.84069/2009 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. Motiram S/o Khandappa Bhoosne Aged 47 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o: Alanga, Tq. Aland, District Gulbarga. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.AMEET KUMAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND:
Sidram S/o Shankar Gawade Aged 52 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o: Alanga, Tq. Aland, District Gulbarga.
Manik S/o Khandappa Bhoosne Aged 57 years, 2 Occ: Agriculture R/o: Alanga, Tq. Aland, District Gulbarga.
Kondiba W/o Khandappa Bhoosne Aged 67 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o: Alanga, Tq. Aland, District Gulbarga.
Operative part
Ramesh S/o Khandappa Bhoosne Aged 37 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Alanga Tq. Aland, District Gulbarga. ..RESPONDENTS (RESPONDENTS 1 & 4 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 30.11.2009 PASSED ON IN O.S.NO.22/2007 PASSED BY THE I.A.NO.VIII LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN), ALAND, THE CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-E. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: 3 ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner submits that suit in O.S.22/2007 has been disposed of as settled out of court. In view of the same present writ petition has become infructuous. Placing his submission on record writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- JUDGE SBN
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.