SMT. NIRMALA BAI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, writ petition stands dismissed for default
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. BASWARAJ S/O LATE KASHINATH AGE: 38 YEARS, R/O HUMNABAD ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER ANNEXURE-G DATED 26.09.2011 IN NO: LAND/CR-28/2011- 12/3876-79 PASSED BY…
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.84422/2011(KLR-RR) ... PETITIONER BETWEEN: SMT. NIRMALA BAI WIFE OF LATE BASAWARAJ @ BASSAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD R/O H.NO. 21-459 SITUATED IN BASAVA COLONY HUMNABAD, DIST. BIDAR (BY SRI NAMDEV B.S. & SRI R.V.BHAVIKATTI, FOR M/S. NAMDEV LAW ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATES- ABSENT) AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECTRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING BANGALORE
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BIDAR
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BASWAKALYAN, DIST. BIDAR 2
THE TAHASILDAR HUMNABAD
TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL HUMNABAD, THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER
Operative part
BASWARAJ S/O LATE KASHINATH AGE: 38 YEARS, R/O HUMNABAD ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER ANNEXURE-G DATED 26.09.2011 IN NO: LAND/CR-28/2011- 12/3876-79 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND ALSO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE ANNEXURE-H DATED 30.09.2011 IN NO: LND/CR-53/2011- 12/1718 ISSUED BY THE TAHASILDAR, HUMNABAD, THE 4TH RESPONDENT AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER It is seen from the order sheet that there has been no representation on behalf of petitioner on more than one occasion. Hence, writ petition stands dismissed for default. *sp Sd/- JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, writ petition stands dismissed for default
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.