Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with no
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. ThE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD KAVERI BHAVAN K.G. ROAD. BANGALORE- 560 009. ThE KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD GULBARGA. BY ITS EXECUTh’E ENGINEER. KHB OFFICE OPP. BUS SThND GULBARGA. ... RESPONDENTS (By SRI ASHOK It KALLANSIIETTY, ADV FOR R- I t R•21 THIS WRIT PETITION FILED…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE j5TK DAY OF JUNE 2012 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA W.P.NO.8277412009 (GM-RES) BEinEN: I. THE KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD PLO1S AND 110 USES ALLOTEES ASSOCIATION OLD AIRPORT LAND. GULBARGA. BY ITS PRESIDENT KIRAN Sb BASVANTHA RAO SHEflAKAR AGE:45 YEARS 0CC: SOCIAL WORKER. o U LI3ARGA. .... I ‘ICTITION KRS (By SRI VEERESII B PATIL, ADV.) AND:
Operative part
ThE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD KAVERI BHAVAN K.G. ROAD. BANGALORE- 560 009. ThE KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD GULBARGA. BY ITS EXECUTh’E ENGINEER. KHB OFFICE OPP. BUS SThND GULBARGA. ... RESPONDENTS (By SRI ASHOK It KALLANSIIETTY, ADV FOR R- I t R•21 THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I)IREC’IING THE RESPONDENTS TO RE-L)ETERMINE ThE COST OF P1DTS/IIOLJSES ALLOTTED 1W THEM IN AIRPORT LAN I) LAYO I. TI’ AT CU LL3ARGA. This writ petition coming on for preliminary hearing in ‘W group this day, the Court made the following: ORDER After arguing the matter br somc time. the learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Submission of the learned advocate stands recorded. the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. Sd/ JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with no
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.