VAIJINATE I S/U SIDRAMAPPA KAJI v. ThE DEPtJ’IY COMMISSIONER
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA W.P.No.8 1 125/2010(LA-RES) BETWEEN: VAIJINATE I S/U SIDRAMAPPA KAJI AGED ABOUT :35 YEARS. RIO HARt;GERI. BIDAR (BY SRI SANJEEV KUMAR C. PA1IL, ADVOCATE) PETITIONER AND:
ThE DEPtJ’IY COMMISSIONER BIDAR. 1)1ST: BIDAR.
ThE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER P.W.D. DIVISION BIDAR
ThE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER P.W.D. SUB-DWISION, BIDAR RESPONI)EN’lS (BY SRI SHIVAKUMAR R ‘1ENGU, AQA FOR Ri TO R3) ‘mis WRIT PETiTION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO iNITIATE ACQUISII1ON PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF i’l1 t ‘1 I L ‘ -1 I’II / / I) V V (1 I ORDER I ‘I, I I I IL ‘I •1 I 115 5 1; c I 55: VI’ St -cj I jC1 Ii’ I- S-t S’ t I 1 j / 1,11 1 %/I I t1 1 1 JlI1. 5 5 1 i 11 11 I 4 S 3 petitioner to approach the respondents with a detailed representation. If any such representation is made. it Is expected that the respondents would consider the same in accordance with law and take decision in the matter. if the claim of the petitioner has become time barred. this order would not revive the stale claim, if any. Sd/ JUDGE NH
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.