THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER v. MINHAJ AFZAL
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In the result, appeal as well as I.A.I/2012 are rejected. I.A.II/2012 for stay does not survive consideration and the same is accordingly disposed off. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE VBC
Judgment
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C R KUMARASWAMY WRIT APPEAL NO.50496/2012 (LA-RES) BETWEEN:
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GULBARGA DISTRICT, GULBARGA THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER GULBARGA DISTRICT, GULBARGA THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT , GULBARGA DIVISION, GULBARGA ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. M.KUMAR, AGA) AND: MINHAJ AFZAL S/O USMAN AFZAL JAGIRDAR AGE: 49 OCC: AGRICULTURIST AFZAL KHAN CHOUK, AFZALPUR DIST: GULBARGA ... RESPONDENT WA.50496/2012 2 THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 1.7.2011 PASSED BY THE SINGLE JUDGE IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.82151/2011(LA-RES) THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, DR. BHAKTHAVATSALA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT There is no illegality in the impugned order. Hence question of issuing notice on I.A.I/2012 for condonation of delay of 343 days in filing appeal does not arise.
In the result, appeal as well as I.A.I/2012 are rejected. I.A.II/2012 for stay does not survive consideration and the same is accordingly disposed off. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE VBC
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.