NANJEGOWDA v. RANGASHETTY
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R.KUMARASWAMY REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.239/2009 (INJ) BETWEEN : 1 2 NANJEGOWDA S/O LATE KEMPAMMA AGED ABOUT 75 MAHADEVEGOWDA S/O NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT CHINNAMBALLI VILLAGE NANJANGUD TALUK- 571301 MYSORE DISTRICT ...APPELLANTS ( BY SRI. N R PADMA, ADV.) AND : RANGASHETTY S/O LATE DASASHETTY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT TAGADOOR VILLAGE, BILIGERE HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK – 571301 ...RESPONDENT ( BY SRI. B SHARATH KUMAR, ADV. ) 2 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 1.12.2008 PASSED IN R.A. NO.55/2003 ON THE FILEOF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) & JMFC, NANJANGUD, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.08.2003 PASSED IN O.S. NO.132/1995 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) NANJANGUD. THIS RSA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned Cousnel for respondent files a memo dated
20.4.2012. The memo reads as under: “The undersigned reports the death of sole respondent Rangashetty in the above appeal. The respondent Rangashetty expired on 30.9.2011. Death certificate is enclosed along with this memo”. The date of death of Rangashetty is 30.9.2011. Though Rangashetty was expired on 30.9.2011, till today, no steps have been taken to bring the LRs of deceased Rangashetty. In that view of the matter, this Regular Second Appeal is abated. Vsk/- Sd/- JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.