✦ Karnataka High Court

SMT.PARAVVA v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, UKP, JAMAKHANDI

K LMANJUNATH, K GOVINDARAJULU, K L MANJUNATH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

appellants, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. .APPELLANTS (BY SRI.B.M.ANGADI AND RATNAMALA G.H., ADVS.) AND THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, UKP, JAMAKHANDI.. (BY SRI.C.S.PATIL, AGA) • RESPONDENT THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER UNDER APPEAL DATED 21.06.2011 IN…

Judgment

SMT.PARAVVA W/O MAHADEV CHATRABAN, AGE: 64 YEARS. 0CC: AGRICULTURE, SMT.SHANTAVVA W/O DHAREPPA CHATRABAN, AGE: 40 YEARS, 0CC: AGRICULTURE, SMT.BASAVVA D/O MAHADEV CHATRABAN, AGE: 30 YEARS, 0CC: AGRICULTURE, ALL ARE R/O JAKANUR VILLAGE, TQ.JAMAKHANDI. 4. LAXMAPPA S/0 SHIVAPPA CHATRABAN, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS. 1(a) SMT.SHIVAVVA W/0 LAXMAPPA CHATRABAN, AGE: 60 YEARS, 0CC: AGRICULTURIST, 1(b) NAGESH S/0 LAXMAPPA CHATRABAN, AGE: 28 YEARS, 0CC: AGRICULTURIST, SIDDU S/0 LAXMAPPA CHATRABAN, AGE: 24 YEARS, 0CC: AGRICULTURIST, 1(c) ALL ARE R/0 KUNCHANOOR VILLAGE, TQ .JAMAKHANDI. 2 1(d) 1(e) SMT.ANUSUYA W/O HANAMAPPA DHULASHETTY, AGE: 33 YEARS, 0CC: H.HOLD WORK, R/O INGALAGI VILLAGE, TQ. MUDHOL. SMT.SAVITA W/O DHAREPPA DANAGOUDA, AGE: 26 YEARS, 0CC: H.HOLD WORK. R/O LAXMI NAGAR, JAMAKHANDI. SMT.SHOBHA W/O SHIVAPPA CHATRABAN, AGE:35 YEARS, 0CC: H.HOLD WORK, MUDHOL. GIRIMALLAPPA S/0 SHIVAPPA CHATRABAN, AGE: 63 YEARS, 0CC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O JAKANUR VILLAGE, TQ. JAMAKHANDI.

Operative part

6.

.APPELLANTS (BY SRI.B.M.ANGADI AND RATNAMALA G.H., ADVS.) AND THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, UKP, JAMAKHANDI.. (BY SRI.C.S.PATIL, AGA) • RESPONDENT THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER UNDER APPEAL DATED 21.06.2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.62897/2011, AND THE WRIT APPEAL MAY KINDLY BE ALLOWED BY GRANTING THE RELIEF AS PRAYED THERE UNDER. 3 THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, K.L.MANJUNATH, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT In view of the memo filed by the counsel for the appellants, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. MBS/- Sd! TUDGE ScI,c JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments