Karnataka High Court · 2012
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 11, 12
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR CCC Nos.1092-1100/2012 (CIVIL) BETWEEN : 1 B P PRAKASH NARAYANA S/O LATE H PUTTANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RETIRED ASSISTANT #755, 15TH 'B' MAIN ROAD, 1ST STAGE, 1ST PHASE GOKULA MATTHIKERE, BANGALORE 560054 2 KRISTOPHER BENJAZMEAN S/O LATE D.M.JACAB AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RETIRED SENIOR TYPIST #9, GRACE STAR APARTMENT, 202, 3RD CROSS, VIVEKANAGAR BANGALORE 33 3 SADASHIVAIAH S/O PUTTARAVANNA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS RETIRED SENIOR ASSISTANT BESCOM, 2 R/A 238, 4TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN, GOKULA ROAD, NEAR DODHIGHAT SIT EXTENSION, TUMKUR 4 H R SHANKARA NARAYANACHAR S/O H.RANGANARSIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RETIRED ASSISTANT, BESCOM NO.216, 6TH CROSS, 14TH MAINROAD, GROUP 'D' LAYOUT, SRIGANDADAKAVALU, SUNKADAKATTE, BANGALORE 5 M S BASAVARAJ S/O SAMPAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RETIRED SENIOR ASSISTANT, BESCOM, R/A 895, 10TH CROSS, SUBHASNAGAR LAYOUT, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 6 L RAMALINGAPPA S/O LATE LINGIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RETIRED SENIOR ASSISTANT, BESCOM, R/A 12/11-2, THIMMAIAH GARDEN DODDAGUNTA, COX TOWN, BANGALORE 5 7 B VEERANAGAIAH S/O BHIMAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RETIRED JUNIOR ASSISTANT R/A 1196, 3RD CROSS, RAMAMANDIR ROAD, KAVERIPURA, KAMAKSHIPALYA, BANGALORE 79 8 T VENKATESH S/O TURUMALAIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RETIRED SENIOR ASSISTANT, BESCOM, R/A 218, RAILWAY MEN LAYOUT 4TH BLOCK, RAMAKRISHNANAGAR, NANDHINI LAYOUT, BANGALORE 96 3 9 K NAGARAJ S/O K G KASHIBATTA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RETIRED SENIOR ASSISTANT, BESCOM, R/A 27, A.G.B.COLONY, 1ST STAGE 3RD 'A' MAIN, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BANGALORE 86 ...COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI N DEVARAJ, ADV.) AND : 1 DR. MUTHU MOHAN MAJOR GENERAL MANAGER (A & HRD) KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED CAUVERY BHAVAN BANGALORE-560 009.
2 SRI. MANI VANAN MAJOR MANAGING DIRECTOR BESCOM, K.R.CIRCLE BANGALORE-560009 ...ACCUSED (BY SRI SUBRAMANYA, ADV FOR A1, SRI V Y KUMAR & ASSOCTS FOR A2) THESE CONTEMPTS ARE FILED U/S 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN HE PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT BE PLEASED TO INITIATE THE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED UNDER THE CONTEMPT OF THIS 4 HON'BLE COURT IN WILLFULLY DISOBEYING THE ORDERS OF THIS HON'BLE COURT, IN W.P.NO.14997/2008 AS PER ANNEXURE-E. DATED 29.03.2012 THESE CCCs COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY K.L.MANJUNATH J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Sri Subramanya, undertakes to file vakalath for accused No.1. He submits that within four weeks from today the direction issued by the learned Single Judge would be complied with. He further submits that against the order of the learned Single Judge, accused No.1 has already filed a writ appeal and that accused No.1 is going to withdraw the writ appeal.
Recording his submission, the petitions are closed granting four weeks time to comply with the directions. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE JT/-
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 11, 12.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 29 Mar 2012. The bench was K L MANJUNATH, B MANOHAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.