I. BabajanKhan v. Mehaboobsab ‘io. Laiasab
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 173(1)
Judgment
2. Smt. Fathesabhi W/o. Babajan Khan Pachapur, Age: 50 year 0cc: Household, Hubh, Dist: Dhawad, (By SriDinesh M Kulkarni, Advocate) Appellant.s AND:
Mehaboobsab ‘io. Laiasab Age: Maf or. 0cc: O ncr of Vehicle, R/o, id/s India Stills. ? \ J V C Last: Dnarwai.
The National insurance Coitd., By its Divisional Officer. l Floor. Sujata Coplex. OppOlass House, PB. Road. Hub]i, Di.st: Dharwad, (By SriNRKuppelur, Advocate) Respondents This appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award dated Q9OL2OO8 passed in MVC No6OO/2OO5 on the file of the PrLCivil Judge (SrDn) and Addl. MACT, Hubli partly allowing compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation etc.. claim petition for This appeal coming on br admission th••is day, the Court delivered the following: JLDGMENT in this appeal, the appellants have called in question dated 090 1 2008 in MVC oUU/2O0 passed by MACT at Hubli,
2. The grievance of the appeliants is that the compensation awarded by the TribwiM is on lower side. Appellants son by nam AfzaIkhan died in a motor accident on •1 5062005. On the date of accident. caueaseu was 22 :vears, an,d his mother V 55 aged abou.t — S _ a m g S 9 . l f a o D C n o 0 0 D C . 0 D C 0 0 m ‘ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D C 0 . 0 ) 9 4 - o 0I 4 Thc impugned a; aid dated 0901.2008 in M\ C’ No nfl’; 2flflS passed by the Addi MWI H’ 311 hrnby m4ified enhcuu nig 11w compensation Rs2s,3,000 Rs.3.71a1(JO’- Remaining ther apccts impugnc-d acud ltfflwiiS intact and undisturbed V., I 3%
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.