✦ Karnataka High Court

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. (Br Sri P.H.Pawar, Adv. for R2)

H NNAGAMOHAN DAS

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the award accordingly. Sd! TUDGE DKB

Judgment

Shri Mohan Rao Sahed Goture Age: 39 years, 0cc: Driver R/o Goraxan Mal, Sankeshwar, Tq: Hukkeri Dist: Belgaum, Now at Kadak Galli,’ Belgaum 590016. (By Sri, ShriharshANee1opanth, Adv) And: 1 MrViekanand Chanmallappa Goruti Age: Major, 0cc. Business R/o Gorakshan Mal, Sankeshar Tq Hukkeri, Dist Belgaum (0ner of Mini b s DC M Tox ito No KA 23 4€ ) Appellant

2.

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd Branch Office at Ashok Nagar. Nippani, Tc1: Chikodi, through its Divisional Office at Shanbhag Chambers Kirloskar Road. Belgaum-590 016 Respondents (Br Sri P.H.Pawar, Adv. for R2) This MFA is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgement and award dated: 20.7.2006 passed in MVC No.2136/2003 on the file of the II Addl. Civil Judge (SD) & Addl.MACT, Belgaum. This appeal coming on for conciliation before Lok Adalat after being referred vide order dated 14.02.2011 the following order is passed. CONCILIATION ORDER Learned counsel on both the sides are present.

2. After negotiations, the matter settled. The appe1lantclairnant has agreed to receive and the Respondent Insurance Company has agreed to par compensation of .65,000/-(Rupees sixty five thousand only) in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim ,Ajoint Memo is filed on behalf of the parties to this effect. Cl

Operative part

3.

This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the award accordingly. Sd! TUDGE DKB

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments