DHANAYYA S. MATH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- JYOTI MULIMANI
Outcome
Disposed of
Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. MRP/RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 75 Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 102025 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: DHANAYYA S. MATH, 45 YEARS, CLASS-I KPWD CONTRACTOR, DANESHWARI NILAYA, LINGAD GUDI ROAD, CHALUKYA NAGAR, VIJAYANAGAR-586 103. (BY SRI. MANJUNATH A. KARIGANNAVAR, ADVOCATE) … PETITIONER AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KNNL, GRBCC DIV.NO.2, HIDKAL DAM, BELAGAVI-591 107.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KNNL, GRBCC DIV. NO.1, HIDKAL DAM, BELAGAVI-591 107.
CHIEF ENGINEER, KNNL, IRRIGATION NORTH DIVISION, BELAGAVI-590 001.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KNNL, 4TH FLOOR, COFFEE BOARD BUILDING NO.1, - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6885 WP No. 102025 of 2025 DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SHIVARAJ C. BELLAKKI, ADVOCATE FOR R2-R5) … RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri. Manjunath A.Karigannavar., counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Kirtilata R.Patil., HCGP respondent No.1 and Sri. Shivaraj C.Bellakki., counsel for respondents 2 to 5 have appeared in person.
2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing respondent No.2 to consider representation dated:19.11.2024 vide Annexure-G.
3. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care.
4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a mandamus may be ordered directing respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated:19.11.2024 vide Annexure-G. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6885 WP No. 102025 of 2025 HCGP submits that an appropriate order may be passed.
5. A Mandamus is ordered directing respondent No.2 consider representation dated:19.11.2024 vide Annexure-G in accordance with the law, within eight weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order, if not already considered.
Operative part
Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. MRP/RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 75 Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.