MR. DIVAKARA ACHARYA v. STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Case at a glance
- Bench
- JYOTI MULIMANI
- Neutral citation
- 2025:KHC:5242
Outcome
Withdrawn
The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. JAYANTHI ACHARYA W/O DIVAKARA ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT DURGA COMPOUND, KOMBETTU PUTTUR, D K-574 201. …PETITIONERS PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka (BY SRI. HARSHA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SACHIN.B.S., ADVOCATE) AND: STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, 5TH PHASE, 1ST-4TH FLOORS, M.S.BUILDING…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 15806 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
MR. DIVAKARA ACHARYA S/O MADHAV ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT DURGA COMPOUND, KOMBETTU PUTTUR, D.K.-574 201.
Operative part
JAYANTHI ACHARYA W/O DIVAKARA ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT DURGA COMPOUND, KOMBETTU PUTTUR, D K-574 201. …PETITIONERS PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka (BY SRI. HARSHA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SACHIN.B.S., ADVOCATE) AND: STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, 5TH PHASE, 1ST-4TH FLOORS, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BANGALORE-560 001. (BY SRI. GOPALAKRISHNA SOODI., ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5242 WP No. 15806 of 2020 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri. Harsha., counsel on behalf of Sri. Sachin.B.S., for the petitioners has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioners to withdraw the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the order and will not file the Review Petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 47
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.