(BY SRI. LAXMAN T MANTAGANI, ADVOCATE) v. UDAY NAGAR
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
- Karnataka Education Act, 1983 s. 130
- Karnataka Education Act s. 130
Judgment
SRI. SHIVAPPA HEMALAPPA MUDLAPUR, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRIL. & PRESIDENT, SHREE SHARANABASWESHWAR VIDYAPEETH, KALKERI, R/O. VEERAPUR THANDA, TQ: MUNDARGI, DIST: GADAG.
SRI. MALLAPPA HALAPPA NAIKAR, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED EMPLOYEE & SECRETARY, SHREE SHARANABASWESHWAR VIDYAPEETH, KALKERI, R/O. VEERAPUR THANDA, TQ: MUNDARGI, DIST: GADAG. (BY SRI. LAXMAN T MANTAGANI, ADVOCATE) … PETITIONERS AND: RAKESH S HARIHAR
2. Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad 12:16:36 +0530 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY (PRIMARY & SECONDARY EDUCATION), VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER), PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, RODD ROAD, DHARWAD, DIST: DHARWAD-580001.
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, GADAG-582101.
HEAD MASTER, SHREE BHAKTI BHANDHARI BASAVESHWAR HIGH SCHOOL, UDAY NAGAR, HAVERI-581110. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAYAK S KULKARNI, AGA FOR R1-R3) - 2 - WP No. 102294 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT NO. CERTIORARI QUASHING THE f4:±Á.².C:SÁºÀÄvÀÄ:§¸ÀªÉñÀégÀ DATED 20/02/2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-G & ETC. C£ÀÄ:75.2019-20/3554 ºÁªÉÃj: THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER
1. Learned counsel the petitioners after arguing the matter for sometime submits that, he may be permitted to avail the alternative remedy available under Section 130 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 and prays that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed.
2. The said submission is placed on record.
Operative part
3. Writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioners to avail the alternative remedy available under Section 130 of the Karnataka Education Act, before the competent authority. It is needless to state that, if such a remedy is availed of by the petitioners within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of - 3 - WP No. 102294 of 2023 certified copy of this order, the competent authority shall consider the same and dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible. Sd/- JUDGE Kgk/Ct:Bck List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227; Karnataka Education Act, 1983 — s. 130; Karnataka Education Act — s. 130.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Karnataka High Court, on 20 Feb 2023. The bench was S VISHWAJITH SHETTY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.